Entries in comment (3)

Wednesday
Sep302009

Google Sidewiki - Another front in the Content Wars

UPDATE: Sidewiki “policies”:

Keep Sidewiki spam and malware free. Spam includes, but is not limited to, unwanted promotional or commercial content, or posts with gibberish such as keyword spamming.  We also don’t allow the transmission of malware, viruses, or anything that may disrupt the service or harm others. 

Speak your mind without being hateful or threatening to others.  Lively discussions can happen without posting hateful, threatening, harassing, or bullying content.  We encourage you to work out disputes or disagreements on your own. However, in serious or egregious cases, we will take action.  

Keep it legal.  Don’t engage in unlawful activities on this product.  If we are notified of unlawful activities, we will take appropriate action, which may include removing access to Sidewiki, your Google account, or reporting you to the appropriate authorities.

Respect copyright laws.  We will respond to clear notices of alleged copyright infringement.  Repeated infringement of intellectual property rights, including copyright, will result in account termination.  For more information on Google’s copyright policies, please see here

Don’t post or link to sexually explicit material.  Posts that are irrelevant and serve to drive traffic to material with nudity, graphic sex acts, or sexually explicit content are considered spam and aren’t allowed. We also don’t allow posts that promote unlawful or inappropriate sexual acts with or depictions of children or animals.   

Google has a zero-tolerance policy against child pornography. If we become aware of child pornography on our properties, the content will be removed and we will report it and its owners to the appropriate authorities.

Don’t pretend to be someone else. We don’t allow impersonation of others or other behavior that is misleading or intended to be misleading.

Don’t share personal or confidential information.  We don’t allow unauthorized publishing of people’s private and confidential information, such as credit card numbers, Social Security numbers, driver’s and other license numbers, or any other information that is not publicly accessible. 

 


I was engaged in the constant and tedious chore I call “twitter gardening” when I noticed that Google Sidewiki had content attached to Twitter’s home page: (image linked to Sidewiki comment pictured)

Setting aside questions about Sidewiki’s purpose, originality, et cetera, it seems that Sidewiki has opened a new front in the Content Wars. There is a clear incentive to adding Sidewiki content: Google exposure, such as quick access to your Google profile, and traffic to whatever links you include.

This is one more place for spammers and scammers to go crazy, to say nothing of self-promoting “social media experts” and the like.

I don’t know about you, but I’m not at all excited about the prospect of more “gardening chores,” especially since Google has not done a good job in preventing and removing Google Groups spammers or Google Maps errors.

What do you think? Be the first and tell me in a Sidewiki comment on this site if you dare.

 

Sunday
Mar222009

Stack Overflow - collaboratively edited question and answer site for programmers

Hello World!

Stack Overflow is a collaboratively edited question and answer site for programmers — regardless of platform or language. It’s 100% free, no registration required.
  • I’ve thoroughly vetted Stack Overflow — the podcast, blog, team, and the question and answer main site.

  • Here is the “46th episode of the StackOverflow podcast, live from MIX09, where Joel and Jeff answer questions from the live audience.”

  • I’m giving this effort a recommendation without any reservations. They have some interesting variations on voting and reputation and a very different approach to how your un-vetted opinions affect the site. They are committed to preventing any gaming of the voting system.

User reechard - Stack Overflow.

Wednesday
Mar112009

Yahoo Pipes - an "expert" weighs in and misses the point

UPDATE: Apparently I now have someone's attention. Let me take a moment to address "experts" of all kinds who would seek to maintain or attain their status... and at the same time, not be particularly "helpful." If there is a lesson here, let it be this:
I don't call myself an "expert" in many fields... but I am lucky enough to have decades of experience in several. I do however learn quickly and am familiar with teh interwebz, online forums, chat rooms,  blogs, trolls, hackers, and all sorts of people who apparently make a living being "social media experts", "SEO experts" and the like. I'll say this once: I won't be "fake friending" you in hopes of getting traffic and/or business. I don't need your traffic, and I'd rather not go on about an unfortunate incident or misunderstanding. If you missed the boat, too bad... maybe you'll get another chance to be helpful. If it turns out your expertise isn't needed during the 24 hours I learn about Yahoo Pipes, or whatever other subject, don't take it personally. If you'd like to be a part of the Soft Machine experiment, drop me an introductory comment or engage with me elsewhere. Don't expect me to entertain you in the commentary, or let you air your grievances, especially if you flubbed your chance to actually be helpful.
The Yahoo Pipes "expert" Hapdaniel (y!) (twitter) tells me I've fixed nothing, and should have read his tweet. Also, I'm apparently a terrible person for having a huge master OPML that I want to efficiently process. Too bad he's too busy being an "expert" to notice that I added the ability to "filter on folder name" while scanning the OPML! My feedback to the nice people at Yahoo:
I tried to find suitable pipes, but in the end I had to write them myself. In addition, the person who responded on the message board was most unhelpful and nasty, and obviously thinks it's a terrible thing to have a large OPML. And, he doesn't understand that one wants to filter while scanning the OPML - that's a key to having a huge master OPML that you can still use for multiple things efficiently. I doubt I'll participate here much going forward. I like Pipes though, and blogged about it, and deployed them on my site... Thanks... and nice job on the Pipes machinery itself.